<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Adopt SpecDD on existing projects | SpecDD</title><link>https://specdd.ai/how-to/adopt-specdd-on-existing-projects/</link><description>Spec-driven development adoption guides for existing repositories: plan rollout, map codebases, spec legacy modules, migrate architecture docs, run pilots, and measure impact.</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><atom:link href="https://specdd.ai/how-to/adopt-specdd-on-existing-projects/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>How to plan a SpecDD adoption for an existing repo</title><link>https://specdd.ai/how-to/adopt-specdd-on-existing-projects/how-to-plan-a-specdd-adoption-for-an-existing-repo/</link><guid>https://specdd.ai/how-to/adopt-specdd-on-existing-projects/how-to-plan-a-specdd-adoption-for-an-existing-repo/</guid><description>Plan spec-driven development adoption for an existing repository by choosing one high-value area, drafting reviewed specs, running one small change, and expanding gradually.</description></item><item><title>How to introduce SpecDD to a skeptical team</title><link>https://specdd.ai/how-to/adopt-specdd-on-existing-projects/how-to-introduce-specdd-to-a-skeptical-team/</link><guid>https://specdd.ai/how-to/adopt-specdd-on-existing-projects/how-to-introduce-specdd-to-a-skeptical-team/</guid><description>Introduce spec-driven development to a skeptical team by addressing documentation, process, tests, tickets, and agent-context concerns with a small pilot and concrete evidence.</description></item><item><title>How to introduce SpecDD without slowing delivery</title><link>https://specdd.ai/how-to/adopt-specdd-on-existing-projects/how-to-introduce-specdd-without-slowing-delivery/</link><guid>https://specdd.ai/how-to/adopt-specdd-on-existing-projects/how-to-introduce-specdd-without-slowing-delivery/</guid><description>Introduce spec-driven development without slowing delivery by adding specs only around active work, keeping drafts small, reviewing quickly, and measuring practical signals.</description></item><item><title>How to run a SpecDD pilot</title><link>https://specdd.ai/how-to/adopt-specdd-on-existing-projects/how-to-run-a-specdd-pilot/</link><guid>https://specdd.ai/how-to/adopt-specdd-on-existing-projects/how-to-run-a-specdd-pilot/</guid><description>Run a spec-driven development pilot with one team, one repository, one active area, clear success criteria, lightweight review, and a decision about whether to expand.</description></item><item><title>How to map an existing codebase into specs</title><link>https://specdd.ai/how-to/adopt-specdd-on-existing-projects/how-to-map-an-existing-codebase-into-specs/</link><guid>https://specdd.ai/how-to/adopt-specdd-on-existing-projects/how-to-map-an-existing-codebase-into-specs/</guid><description>Map an existing codebase into SpecDD specs for spec-driven development by surveying roots, modules, ownership boundaries, active work, existing docs, and local behavior before writing .sdd files.</description></item><item><title>How to generate draft specs from existing code</title><link>https://specdd.ai/how-to/adopt-specdd-on-existing-projects/how-to-generate-draft-specs-from-existing-code/</link><guid>https://specdd.ai/how-to/adopt-specdd-on-existing-projects/how-to-generate-draft-specs-from-existing-code/</guid><description>Generate draft SpecDD specs for spec-driven development from existing code safely by limiting scope, separating observed behavior from intent, reviewing assumptions, and approving before implementation.</description></item><item><title>How to spec a legacy module safely</title><link>https://specdd.ai/how-to/adopt-specdd-on-existing-projects/how-to-spec-a-legacy-module-safely/</link><guid>https://specdd.ai/how-to/adopt-specdd-on-existing-projects/how-to-spec-a-legacy-module-safely/</guid><description>Spec a legacy module safely with spec-driven development by separating intended behavior from accidental behavior, marking assumptions, narrowing authority, and changing one slice at a time.</description></item><item><title>How to adopt SpecDD one folder at a time</title><link>https://specdd.ai/how-to/adopt-specdd-on-existing-projects/how-to-adopt-specdd-one-folder-at-a-time/</link><guid>https://specdd.ai/how-to/adopt-specdd-on-existing-projects/how-to-adopt-specdd-one-folder-at-a-time/</guid><description>Adopt spec-driven development one folder at a time by starting with a root spec, adding folder-level context for active areas, and expanding local specs only as work reaches them.</description></item><item><title>How to migrate from ARCHITECTURE.md or a big requirements doc to local specs</title><link>https://specdd.ai/how-to/adopt-specdd-on-existing-projects/how-to-migrate-from-architecture-md-or-a-big-requirements-doc-to-local-specs/</link><guid>https://specdd.ai/how-to/adopt-specdd-on-existing-projects/how-to-migrate-from-architecture-md-or-a-big-requirements-doc-to-local-specs/</guid><description>Migrate from ARCHITECTURE.md or big requirements documents to local SpecDD specs for spec-driven development by extracting durable rules, mapping them to owners, and leaving rationale in docs.</description></item><item><title>How to measure whether SpecDD is helping</title><link>https://specdd.ai/how-to/adopt-specdd-on-existing-projects/how-to-measure-whether-specdd-is-helping/</link><guid>https://specdd.ai/how-to/adopt-specdd-on-existing-projects/how-to-measure-whether-specdd-is-helping/</guid><description>Measure whether spec-driven development is helping by tracking correction loops, wrong-file edits, review clarity, spec-code drift, onboarding, task completion, and verification quality.</description></item></channel></rss>